Key takeaways
– World Liberty Financial launched World Liberty Markets, an onchain borrowing and lending platform built around its dollar-pegged stablecoin USD1.
– The platform uses smart contracts to automate lending terms, collateral ratios and liquidations, replacing centralized intermediaries with transparent, blockchain-visible controls.
– USD1 is the primary borrowing and settlement asset, enabling users to unlock liquidity from volatile holdings such as ETH or tokenized BTC without selling them.
– Supported collateral includes ETH, tokenized Bitcoin, major stablecoins and USD1, with plans to add tokenized real-world assets to expand onchain credit use cases.
World Liberty Financial is a DeFi initiative focused on payments, lending and treasury services built on blockchain rails. The project, which has attracted attention for reported links to the Trump family, emphasizes compliant and transparent crypto financial products. Its approach mirrors broader DeFi trends that combine stablecoins, collateralized lending and asset tokenization into unified onchain systems.
Debut of World Liberty Markets and USD1
World Liberty entered the digital-asset lending market with World Liberty Markets, which launched on Jan. 12, 2026. The protocol is centered on USD1, a US dollar–pegged stablecoin whose circulating supply has grown to roughly $3.4 billion, and the WLFI governance token. Before the lending launch, USD1 was used for cross-border transfers, corporate treasury operations and liquidity on decentralized exchanges. Rising USD1 liquidity has extended its role from a trading pair to a settlement asset for broader financial activity and now onchain credit.
How World Liberty Markets works
World Liberty Markets is a collateralized lending protocol where users can deposit assets to earn yield, post collateral to borrow USD1, and manage positions via smart contracts. Lending terms, interest rates, collateral requirements and liquidation thresholds are enforced onchain rather than by offchain underwriting.
Collateral accepted at launch includes:
– Ether (ETH)
– Tokenized Bitcoin representations (BTC)
– Stablecoins such as USDC and USDT
– USD1
Interest rates are determined by supply and demand in each asset pool and can adjust frequently, reflecting real-time market conditions. If collateral value drops below required levels, smart-contract-driven liquidations can occur automatically to protect lender pools.
The protocol also plans to support tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) in the future. RWAs could enable tokens tied to real estate, treasury instruments or other offchain assets to collateralize loans, expanding onchain credit beyond crypto-native collateral—but raising challenges around verification, legal enforceability and cross-border compliance.
Why stablecoins matter for onchain credit
Stablecoins provide a stable unit of account, lower volatility than crypto collateral, and easier integration with offchain payments. In World Liberty’s model, borrowers pledge volatile assets like ETH or tokenized BTC to borrow USD1, gaining liquidity without selling underlying holdings. This mirrors traditional secured loans but is executed entirely through blockchain smart contracts.
Stablecoin-based lending also supports advanced activities such as leveraged trading, hedging and treasury funding for crypto businesses. The central role of USD1 makes liquidity and reserve transparency—alongside regulatory clarity—critical for market confidence.
Regulatory positioning and long-term strategy
World Liberty has applied for a national trust bank charter with the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), signaling a strategy that emphasizes compliance. If approved, a charter could enable custodial services, more tightly integrated stablecoin issuance with regulated financial activities, and easier partnerships with traditional payment systems. This pursuit of regulated structures reflects a wider industry shift toward aligning crypto services with conventional finance as legal frameworks evolve.
Evolution of crypto lending and contrasts with centralized failures
The last crypto cycle exposed failures of centralized lending firms that used excessive leverage, unclear risk controls, and rehypothecation of client assets. Incidents involving platforms like BlockFi and Celsius underscored risks of centralized credit, rather than flaws inherent to decentralized protocols.
DeFi lending contrasts with those failures by using explicit collateral ratios, open liquidation mechanics and real-time solvency checks onchain. Venture investment and developer activity are increasing in areas such as Bitcoin-backed lending, RWA tokenization and institutional DeFi, suggesting maturation of onchain credit markets.
Risks and navigating onchain lending
Onchain lending introduces specific risks:
– Smart contract vulnerabilities and bugs
– Rapid market shocks that trigger fast liquidations
– Regulatory uncertainty about stablecoin reserves and disclosures
– Liquidity concentration in a small set of assets
Overcollateralization reduces counterparty risk but limits access for users without substantial crypto holdings, meaning current onchain credit mainly enhances capital efficiency for existing holders rather than broad financial inclusion. Adding RWAs could widen access, but brings legal, operational and validation challenges.
Practical safety measures for users
– Understand smart-contract risk and prefer audited protocols
– Monitor collateral ratios and maintain healthy buffers to avoid liquidations
– Diversify collateral exposure to reduce single-asset concentration risk
– Track stablecoin reserve disclosures and regulatory developments
Conclusion
World Liberty Markets demonstrates how a large stablecoin like USD1 can anchor an onchain lending market, offering liquidity and settlement efficiency while leveraging smart contracts for transparency and automation. Its move toward regulated structures and potential RWA integration reflects broader industry trends, though users and institutions must still manage smart-contract, market and regulatory risks as these systems scale.
Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. The selection, commissioning and publication of Features and Magazine content are not influenced by advertisers, partners or commercial relationships.
